Connect with us

Politics

Former American ambassador: the new Ukraine-Moldova customs regime is not a blockade

Reading Time: 3 minutesMoldova had approached Ukraine in the past for assistance in enforcing Moldovan regulations on goods moving across the border between Ukraine and the Transdniestrian region of Moldova. While agreement

Published

on

Reading Time: 3 minutes

The Washington Profile’s interview with John Todd Stewart, former U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Moldova, 1995-1998

March 23, 2006

Washington Profile: What do you see as the underlying reasons for the current crisis between Ukraine, Transdniestria and Moldova?

Stewart: Moldova had approached Ukraine in the past for assistance in enforcing Moldovan regulations on goods moving across the border between Ukraine and the Transdniestrian region of Moldova. While agreements were announced, the Ukrainians ultimately failed to carry through with their commitments. But at the end of last year the Moldovans and the Ukrainians reached a new such agreement that closely coincided with the inauguration of the European Union’s border assistance project to encourage the enforcement of customs controls on the Moldo-Ukrainian border. There seemed to be some hiccups in the implementation of that latest agreement as well. But finally the Ukrainians made clear that they were going to abide by it. And that decision led to the current “crisis,” if you wish to call it that.

The Moldovans have made clear that the new customs regime is not a blockade, for they are prepared to register any legitimate Transdniestrian firm and provide that firm with the necessary stamps that would allow the company’s exports to move across the Ukrainian border. The Moldovans are not trying to exact financial advantage from this operation as Transdniestrian firms have been exempted from Moldovan taxes and duties on their shipments. However, the Transdniestrian regime saw the new regulations– quite correctly, I suspect–as one step on a very slippery slope that would lead to the abrogation of their own authority; if the Moldovan government’s stamps are required for foreign trade, then Chisinau’s approval could become necessary for other activities as well. Consequently, Smirnov and his regime instituted what the Moldovans have called an “auto-blockade,” forbidding goods to come in and out of Transnistria. Because if any goods did enter or leave, they would have to clear Moldovan customs.

Washington Profile: In your judgment, what are some possible outcomes of the crisis?

Stewart: The Ukrainian actions have received strong support from the United States and the European Union. On the other hand, the Russian Federation and a number of commentators in Moscow have sided with the Transdniestrian regime and have, I would assume, been putting pressure on the Ukrainians to back away from the enforcement of their agreement with the Moldovans. The Yushchenko government in Kyiv thus far has held quite firm; the real question now is what’s going to happen in the Ukrainian elections. If there is a change in government, will Ukraine stand by the agreement? That remains to be seen.

Washington Profile: Do you believe the Moldovan government would be willing to make any concessions in the dispute?

Stewart: There’s little or nothing that the Moldovan government could offer in the way of concessions that hasn’t already been put in place. The Moldovans have made clear that they’re not going to seek financial advantage from the new arrangement; what they’re trying to establish is a point of principle. I can’t really see them backing off that point of principle, which is, of course, what has Smirnov and his regime so upset.

Washington Profile: To what extent is the Transdniestria conflict similar to or different from other conflicts in the former Soviet Union; take Abkhazia and South Ossetia, for example?

Stewart: The main similarity is certainly that Moscow is supporting all three of these would-be statelets. The major difference is that Abkhazia and South Ossetia border on the Russian Federation while Transdniestria does not. Threrefore, Ukrainian cooperation is necessary for Transdniestria’s survival. And this of course raises the question why the Ukrainians had previously been so hesitant to side with the Moldovans in putting pressure on the Transdniestrian regime. Why would Ukrainians want an outpost of the Russian Federation occupied by Russian troops on its southern border?

Washington Profile: Why do you think that might be?

Stewart: There are all sorts of explanations that one can come up with, but I can think of no geopolitical reason other than heavy pressure from the Russians, who could threaten sanctions through reductions in, or higher prices for, Russia’s energy exports to Ukraine. Beyond geopolitics the question of personal agendas has to be considered: were there people in power in Ukraine in the past, when earlier agreements abrogated, who were benefiting financially from the continuing existence of Transdniestria?

________
Ambassador Stewart’s views are entirely his own and should under no circumstances be construed as representing the positions of the U.S. Department of State or any other department or agency of the U.S. government.
________

Reprinted with the permission of the Washington Profile (www.washprofile.org)

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

FC Sheriff Tiraspol victory: can national pride go hand in hand with political separatism?

Published

on

Reading Time: 4 minutes

A new football club has earned a leading place in the UEFA Champions League groups and starred in the headlines of worldwide football news yesterday. The Football Club Sheriff Tiraspol claimed a win with the score 2-1 against Real Madrid on the Santiago Bernabeu Stadium in Madrid. That made Sheriff Tiraspol the leader in Group D of the Champions League, including the football club in the groups of the most important European interclub competition for the first time ever.

International media outlets called it a miracle, a shock and a historic event, while strongly emphasizing the origin of the team and the existing political conflict between the two banks of the Dniester. “Football club from a pro-Russian separatist enclave in Moldova pulls off one of the greatest upsets in Champions League history,” claimed the news portals. “Sheriff crushed Real!” they said.

Moldovans made a big fuss out of it on social media, splitting into two groups: those who praised the team and the Republic of Moldova for making history and those who declared that the football club and their merits belong to Transnistria – a problematic breakaway region that claims to be a separate country.

Both groups are right and not right at the same time, as there is a bunch of ethical, political, social and practical matters that need to be considered.

Is it Moldova?

First of all, every Moldovan either from the right or left bank of Dniester (Transnistria) is free to identify himself with this achievement or not to do so, said Vitalie Spranceana, a sociologist, blogger, journalist and urban activist. According to him, boycotting the football club for being a separatist team is wrong.

At the same time, “it’s an illusion to think that territory matters when it comes to football clubs,” Spranceana claimed. “Big teams, the ones included in the Champions League, have long lost their connection both with the countries in which they operate, and with the cities in which they appeared and to which they linked their history. […] In the age of globalized commercial football, teams, including the so-called local ones, are nothing more than global traveling commercial circuses, incidentally linked to cities, but more closely linked to all sorts of dirty, semi-dirty and cleaner cash flows.”

What is more important in this case is the consistency, not so much of citizens, as of politicians from the government who have “no right to celebrate the success of separatism,” as they represent “the national interests, not the personal or collective pleasures of certain segments of the population,” believes the political expert Dionis Cenusa. The victory of FC Sheriff encourages Transnistrian separatism, which receives validation now, he also stated.

“I don’t know how it happens that the “proud Moldovans who chose democracy”, in their enthusiasm for Sheriff Tiraspol’s victory over Real Madrid, forget the need for total and unconditional withdrawal of Russian troops from Transnistria!” declared the journalist Vitalie Ciobanu.

Nowadays, FC Sheriff Tiraspol has no other choice than to represent Moldova internationally. For many years, the team used the Moldovan Football Federation in order to be able to participate in championships, including international ones. That is because the region remains unrecognised by the international community. However, the club’s victory is presented as that of Transnistria within the region, without any reference to the Republic of Moldova, its separatist character being applied in this case especially.

Is it a victory?

In fact, FC Sheriff Tiraspol joining the Champions League is a huge image breakthrough for the Transnistrian region, as the journalist Madalin Necsutu claimed. It is the success of the Tiraspol Club oligarchic patrons. From the practical point of view, FC Sheriff Tiraspol is a sports entity that serves its own interests and the interests of its owners, being dependent on the money invested by Tiraspol (but not only) oligarchs.

Here comes the real dilemma: the Transnistrian team, which is generously funded by money received from corruption schemes and money laundering, is waging an unequal fight with the rest of the Moldovan football clubs, the journalist also declared. The Tiraspol team is about to raise 15.6 million euro for reaching the Champions League groups and the amounts increase depending on their future performance. According to Necsutu, these money will go directly on the account of the club, not to the Moldovan Football Federation, creating an even bigger gab between FC Sheriff and other football clubs from Moldova who have much more modest financial possibilities.

“I do not see anything useful for Moldovan football, not a single Moldovan player is part of FC Sheriff Tiraspol. I do not see anything beneficial for the Moldovan Football Federation or any national team.”

Is it only about football?

FC Sheriff Tiraspol, with a total estimated value of 12.8 million euros, is controlled by Victor Gusan and Ilya Kazmala, being part of Sheriff Holding – a company that controls the trade of wholesale, retail food, fuels and medicine by having monopolies on these markets in Transnistria. The holding carries out car trading activities, but also operates in the field of construction and real estate. Gusan’s people also hold all of the main leadership offices in the breakaway region, from Parliament to the Prime Minister’s seat or the Presidency.

The football club is supported by a holding alleged of smuggling, corruption, money laundering and organised crime. Moldovan media outlets published investigations about the signals regarding the Sheriff’s holding involvement in the vote mobilization and remuneration of citizens on the left bank of the Dniester who participated in the snap parliamentary elections this summer and who were eager to vote for the pro-Russian socialist-communist bloc.

Considering the above, there is a great probability that the Republic of Moldova will still be represented by a football club that is not identified as being Moldovan, being funded from obscure money, growing in power and promoting the Transnistrian conflict in the future as well.

Photo: unknown

Continue Reading

Politics

Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita meets high-ranking EU officials in Brussels

Published

on

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Prime Minister of the Republic of Moldova, Natalia Gavrilita, together with Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Nicu Popescu, pay an official visit to Brussels, between September 27-28, being invited by High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell Fontelles.

Today, Prime Minister had a meeting with Charles Michel, President of the European Council. The Moldovan PM thanked the senior European official for the support of the institution in strengthening democratic processes, reforming the judiciary and state institutions, economic recovery and job creation, as well as increasing citizens’ welfare. Natalia Gavrilita expressed her confidence that the current visit laid the foundations for boosting relations between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union, so that, in the next period, it would be possible to advance high-level dialogues on security, justice and energy. Officials also exchanged views on priorities for the Eastern Partnership Summit, to be held in December.

“The EU is open to continue to support the Republic of Moldova and the ambitious reform agenda it proposes. Moldova is an important and priority partner for us,” said Charles Michel.

Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita also met with Paolo Gentiloni, European Commissioner for Economy, expressing her gratitude for the support received through the OMNIBUS macro-financial assistance program. The two officials discussed the need to advance the recovery of money from bank fraud, to strengthen sustainable mechanisms for supporting small and medium-sized enterprises in Moldova, and to standardize the customs and taxes as one of the main conditions for deepening cooperation with the EU in this field.

Additionally, Prime Minister spoke about the importance of the Eastern Partnership and the Deep Free Trade Agreement, noting that the Government’s policies are aimed at developing an economic model aligned with the European economic model, focused on digitalization, energy efficiency and the green economy.

A common press release of the Moldovan Prime Minister with High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission, Josep Borrell Fontelles, took place today, where the agenda of Moldova’s reforms and the main priorities to focus on in the coming months were presented: judiciary reform; fighting COVID-19 pandemic; promoting economic recovery and conditions for growth and job creation; strengthening state institutions and resilience of the country.

“I am here to relaunch the dialogue between my country and the European Union. Our partnership is strong, but I believe there is room for even deeper cooperation and stronger political, economic and sectoral ties. I am convinced that this partnership is the key to the prosperity of our country and I hope that we will continue to strengthen cooperation.”

The Moldovan delegation met Didier Reynders, European Commissioner for Justice. Tomorrow, there are scheduled common meetings with Oliver Varhelyi, European Commissioner for Neighborhood and Enlargement, Adina Valean, European Commissioner for Transport and Kadri Simson, European Commissioner for Energy.

Prime Minister will also attend a public event, along with Katarina Mathernova, Deputy Director-General for Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations.

Photo: gov.md

Continue Reading

Politics

Promo-LEX about Maia Sandu’s UN speech: The president must insist on appointing a rapporteur to monitor the situation of human rights in Transnistria

Published

on

Reading Time: 2 minutes

The President of the Republic of Moldova, Maia Sandu, pays an official visit to New York, USA, between September 21-22. There, she participates in the work of the United Nations General Assembly. According to a press release of the President’s Office, the official will deliver a speech at the tribune of the United Nations.

In this context, the Promo-LEX Association suggested the president to request the appointment of a special rapporteur in order to monitor the situation of human rights in the Transnistrian region. According to Promo-LEX, the responsibility for human rights violations in the Transnistrian region arises as a result of the Russian Federation’s military, economic and political control over the Tiraspol regime.

“We consider it imperative to insist on the observance of the international commitments assumed by the Russian Federation regarding the withdrawal of the armed forces and ammunition from the territory of the country,” the representatives of Promo-LEX stated. They consider the speech before the UN an opportunity “to demand the observance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the Russian Federation with reference to this territory which is in its full control.”

“It is important to remember about the numerous cases of murder, torture, ill-treatment, forced enlistment in illegal military structures, the application of pseudo-justice in the Transnistrian region, all carried out under the tacit agreement of the Russian Federation. These findings stem from dozens of rulings and decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights, which found that Russia is responsible for human rights violations in the region.”

The association representatives expressed their hope that the president of the country would give priority to issues related to the human rights situation in the Transnistrian region and would call on relevant international actors to contribute to guaranteeing fundamental human rights and freedoms throughout Moldova.

They asked Maia Sandu to insist on the observance of the obligation to evacuate the ammunition and the military units of the Russian Federation from the territory of the Republic of Moldova, to publicly support the need for the Russian Federation to implement the ECtHR rulings on human rights violations in the Transnistrian region, and to request the appointment of an UN Human Rights Council special rapporteur  to monitor the human rights situation in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova.

**

The Promo-LEX Association concluded that 14 out of 25 actions planned within the National Action Plan for the years 2018–2022 concerning respecting human rights in Transnistria were not carried out by the responsible authorities.

The association expressed its concern and mentioned that there are a large number of delays in the planned results. “There is a lack of communication and coordination between the designated institutions, which do not yet have a common vision of interaction for the implementation of the plan.”

Promo-LEX requested the Government of the Republic of Moldova to re-assess the reported activities and to take urgent measures, “which would exclude superficial implementation of future activities and increase the level of accountability of the authorities.”

Photo: peacekeeping.un.org

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Latest News

Society3 years ago

“They are not needy, but they need help”. How Moldovan volunteers try to create a safe environment for the Ukrainian refugees

Reading Time: 3 minutesAt the Government’s ground floor, the phones ring constantly, the laptop screens never reach standby. In one...

Important3 years ago

#WorldForUkraine – a map that shows the magnitude of the world’s actions against Russian aggression

Reading Time: 2 minutesThe international community and volunteers from all over te world have launched #WorldForUkraine as a platform that...

Important3 years ago

How is Moldova managing the big influx of Ukrainian refugees? The authorities’ plan, explained 

Reading Time: 3 minutesFrom 24th to 28th of February, 71 359 Ukrainian citizens entered the territory of Republic of Moldova....

Opinion3 years ago

Russia And Ukraine At The Beginning of 2022

Reading Time: 4 minutesThis opinion piece was written by Dr. Nicholas Dima. Dr. Dima was formerly a Professor of Geography and...

Culture3 years ago

The man raising children on Nistru river

Reading Time: 7 minutesOn the Nistru, near the village of Varnița, a few colored pens with blue dots in the...

Culture3 years ago

The village of the first astronomer in the Republic of Moldova

Reading Time: 5 minutesFrom eight in the morning till noon, every Thursday and Sunday, people lay their merchandise on the...

Culture3 years ago

The prodigal son returns and turns his grandparents’ home in a tourist attraction on Nistru river

Reading Time: 7 minutesOn the road towards the school, a well-maintained rural house catches your eye, yellow stags painted on...

Advertisement

Opinions

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © Moldova.org