Politics
Moldovan deputy Premier, Foreign and European Integration Minister’s speech at 61st session of UN General Assembly
Reading Time: 10 minutesMoldovan deputy Premier, Foreign and European Integration Minister’s speech at 61st session of UN General Assembly
Official
08066- Moldovan deputy Premier, Foreign and European Integration Minister’s speech at 61st session of UN General Assembly
(New-York, 26 September 2006)
Mme President
Mr. Secretary General,
Excellencies,
At the outset allow me to congratulate Ambassador Haya Rashed Al Khalifa with her election as President of the 61st session of the UN General Assembly and wish her every success in this highly honourable and responsible position.
My commendation also goes to her predecessor, Mr. Jan Eliasson, for leadership and dedication he provided during the 60th session as well as for the efforts he invested in reforming the organization.
I would like to express my deepest appreciation and praise to Secretary-General Kofi Annan for commitment and determination he has shown in discharging his important duties. Concerning the forthcoming elections of the new Secretary-General, it is the moment to recall that Eastern Europe is the only region that has not been represented in this high position. In this regard, we welcome the candidature of Dr. Vaira Vike-Freiberga, President of the Republic of Latvia.
I would also like to take this opportunity to welcome the accession of Montenegro to the membership of the United Nations. We are confident that its membership will be an important asset in the promotion of the work of this organization in achieving its noble goals.
Distinguished delegates,
The terrorist attacks from 11 September 2001 still loom large in our memory. The fifth anniversary of this tragedy has again filled our television screens with horrific scenes of suffering and death. It has served to remind us of the resolve which is necessary in combating terrorism, which constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security.
Like other countries, the Republic of Moldova believes that fighting international terrorism exclusively through military, political and economic actions is not enough. We must look for solutions which would resolve and not exacerbate the threat and which would be based on the clear understanding of the factors that generate and sustain terrorism, fundamentalism and fanaticism.
The same is true when it comes to conflict resolution.
It is only through the development of integrated strategies aimed at identifying causes of conflicts and terrorism that the international community can bring about long term peace and stability.
With this in mind, Moldova has fully supported the Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy adopted recently by the General Assembly and welcomed its decision to continue the consideration of the Secretary General’s progress Report on Preventing Armed Conflicts during the 61st session.
We consider that the specific measures reflected in the Plan of Action, which is foreseen by the Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, are comprehensive in details and far-reaching in their insight. We need to take practical steps, individually and collectively, to implement the provisions of the Plan.
Likewise, we believe that the recommendations confined in the Secretary General’s progress report on preventing armed conflicts will serve as guiding points for the member states in preventing conflicts throughout the world.
Mme President,
The current High-Level debate, which is focused on the issue of implementing the Global Partnership for Development, is highly significant from the perspective of the challenges I have referred to above. As long as the world is stricken by hunger, poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, oppression, abuse of fundamental rights and freedoms, there will be no solution to the political, economic and social situations that are degenerating in phenomena that we continue to witness with a growing feeling of frustration and uncertainty.
The reaffirmation of the Global Partnership for Development in the World Summit Outcome Document is an implicit recognition by the international community of the imperative to pursue development not only for security but also for ethical, social and economic considerations.
It is essential, therefore, to take specific actions to advance the implementation of agreed development goals, including those contained in the Millennium, Doha, Monterrey and Johannesburg Declarations. Developed and developing countries must build their global partnership for development on the basis of mutual confidence and respect, whereas aid effectiveness and quality are ensured by the balance of appropriate financing and good governance and sound policies. The dynamic and active participation of the private sector, civil society as well as Bretton Woods institutions, WTO and other relevant actors is also of utmost importance.
We all know that the current level of aid is not enough to achieve the MDGs. Therefore, we should look at ways to increase the effectiveness of existing aid, introduce innovative sources of financing, and adhere to the agreed timetable for progressively increasing flows.
Distinguished delegates,
The report of the Secretary General "Investing in the United Nations" with 23 far-reaching proposals on management reform of the organization transcends its intention to continue the consideration of measures endorsed by Heads of State or Government at the 2005 World Summit. My country supported the relevant resolution in the General Assembly in July this year in order to strengthen the United Nations by ensuring the efficient and effective functioning of the Organization and to promote a culture of accountability, transparency and integrity in the Secretariat.
To advance and further implement the provisions of the Outcome document, the Republic of Moldova is willing to support and contribute to the adoption of the necessary decisions which will lead to the revitalization of General Assembly, reform and expansion of the Security Council and increase of effectiveness of the Economic and Social Council.
In particular, we should intensify our efforts to achieve a comprehensive reform of the Security Council. Moldova believes that this reform should be guided by the principles of equitable geographic representation, democracy, effectiveness, efficiency and transparency.
It is on this foundation that we can modernize the composition of the Security Council and bring it into line with the substantial increase in the general membership of the UN. In this context I would like to reiterate the position of my country that the Security Council should be enlarged, both in permanent and non-permanent categories and that the Eastern European Group should be given one additional non-permanent seat.
The Republic of Moldova supported the proposal to set up the Human Rights Council. As a global standard-setting institution, the Council is regarded as a universal body to promote the respect for human rights worldwide, react and respond promptly to human rights violations and to assist countries in strengthening their human rights capacities. We place high expectations on this standing body’s ability not only to react and respond, but also to enforce respect for human rights, especially in the cases of humanitarian crime or conflict zones out of control of sovereign states.
We note that the Council, indeed, had a swift reaction to the events in the Middle East, urgently recalling a special session and appointing an inquiry commission. However, we believe that a balanced approach to the issues of human rights without rushed, one-sided decisions would make the newly established UN body a more credible, trusted and respected institution. We assume that the countries elected to the Human Rights Council shall be guided by the principles of impartiality, objectivity and neutrality with an equitable and unprejudiced approach.
Guided by these principles and being aware of the stringent importance of promoting and protecting human rights worldwide, the Republic of Moldova has decided to present its candidacy for the election to the Human Rights Council for the term of 2010-2013.
Mme President,
Many regional organizations have been entrusted by the UN, under the provisions of Chapter VIII of the Charter, to deal with a number of conflicts that are not in the focus of the UN Security Council. We need a more systematic outreach to these regional organizations.
Steps should be taken to increase their accountability, particularly in the case of protracted or frozen conflicts, when situation is not improving or even worsens over the years. The lack of progress should trigger more direct involvement from the appropriate UN organs. No conflict in the world should be left out of UN’s attention, irrespective of whether they are on the Security Council’s agenda or not.
From this perspective, we are delighted that the General Assembly, despite opposition from some Member States, agreed to include in the agenda of this session a new item proposed by Azerbaijan, Georgia, Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova "on the protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development". These unresolved conflicts continue to impact negatively the political, social and economic development of the GUAM States and the millions of people living in the region.
We believe that bringing the matter to the international community through the General Assembly will facilitate the resolution of conflicts in Azerbaijan, Georgia and the Republic of Moldova and will not undermine, as some fear, the existing mechanisms to negotiate settlements of these conflicts. In this context, I would like to express, on behalf of the Government of the Republic of Moldova, deep gratitude to those countries that supported our initiative.
Distinguished delegates,
The Transnistrian conflict is most and foremost a "product" of geopolitical interests and designs. It has been unleashed with external support immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the declaration of independence and sovereignty by the Republic of Moldova. Unlike other internal conflicts, generated and fostered by ethnical and religious antagonisms, this one has a purely political character. The similarity of the ethnical structure of the population from both sides of the Dniestre River speaks for itself in this regard and cannot be denied.
Over the years the Moldovan authorities have put in place specific policies aimed at ensuring full respect of the human rights of the ethnic minorities, in accordance with the highest international standards. International organizations dealing with the human rights issues have repeatedly attested that in the Republic of Moldova all the conditions for the preservation of the cultural and linguistic identities of ethnic minorities have been created, including the functioning of a great number of schools based on the languages of minorities as well as the broad use of the Russian language as the language of interethnic communication.
The satisfactory resolution of the Gagauz issue by granting a special status to the region concerned is one of the greatest achievements of the national policy of Moldova. It offers, indeed, a unique example in the post "cold war" Europe of an internal conflict settled successfully through political means.
These developments, against the backdrop of the lack of democracy and the growing criticism by the international community of the totalitarian Transnistrian regime from Tiraspol, has determined the separatist leaders to cease the political exploitation of cultural and linguistic factors within the negotiating process.
It should be emphasized here that the territory controlled by the separatists is one of the few regions of the world where the political parties and the non-governmental organisations opposed to the separatist regime are prohibited, where the freedom of mass media and the freedom of opinion are non-existent and where other fundamental freedoms and liberties, especially of the native Moldovan population, are systematically violated.
Also, different types of conventional weapons, including those prohibited or restricted by the relevant arms control international regimes, continue to be manufactured illegally in the region concerned. The process of military build-up in Transnistria is conducted vigorously by the separatist leaders despite the steady efforts by Moldova to reduce its military forces and to settle the political conflict exclusively by peaceful means, without giving up its status of permanent neutrality.
Mme President,
The Moldovan authorities are determined to find a political solution for the Transnistrian conflict based on respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country. This regional security problem should be resolved through negotiations, with the participation of key-actors in the "5+2" format. The end goal of negotiations should be the drafting of a special legal status for the Transnistrian region within the Republic of Moldova. The democratization and demilitarization of the Transnistrian region are indispensable conditions to register progress in the settlement process.
We have a sound roadmap for settling the conflict – the Ukrainian plan together with the documents passed by the Moldovan Parliament in the summer of 2005. It is important that the negotiations resume as soon as possible and without any preconditions. The calls for such negotiations are strongly supported by the Republic Moldova. Although little progress was achieved in the four rounds of the "5+2" negotiations, we believe it is crucial to hold talks rather than preserving the status-quo.
With a view to advance the settlement process the Moldovan authorities undertook a number of complementary actions.
Thus, on 22 July 2005, the Moldovan Parliament adopted the "Law on Fundamental Regulations of the Special Legal Status of Settlements on the Left Bank of the River Dniestre". This law grants Transnistria the right to solve independently the problems related to legal, social and economic development, complying at the same time with the Constitution and the laws of the Republic of Moldova. Moreover, the Law grants the Transnistrian region the right to have its own legislative and executive bodies, as well as more official languages.
Also, the Moldovan Government adopted decisions that establish a system of social and economic guarantees for the Transnistrian population, which should facilitate its reintegration into the social and economic system of the country.
In the same vane, conditions have been created for bringing the activity of the Transnistrian companies into the legal framework of the country through their registration with relevant constitutional authorities, which should allow those companies to fully benefit from the trade preferences Moldova has with its partners, including the European Union.
This has been possible due to a joint commitment of the Moldovan and Ukrainian authorities to secure our common border. The deployment of the EU Border Assistance Mission facilitated the cooperation between the Moldovan and Ukrainian relevant services aimed at establishing a single customs regime and controlling efficiently the frontier. We are confident that this trilateral interaction will contribute to settling the Transnistrian problem.
We use this opportunity to inform the Assembly that on 17 September 2006, the separatist Transnistrian regime held a so-called referendum on the region’s future. We condemn this pseudo-referendum, which infringes flagrantly the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova, undermines the country’s territorial integrity and defies the democratic values and standards.
The Republic of Moldova is grateful to the mediators and observers of the negotiating process – EU, USA, OSCE and Ukraine – for their resolute position on the non-recognition of that farce.
We continue to be concerned with the tensions in the Security Zone. The inefficiency of the current peacekeeping mechanism dictates the need for its transformation into a multinational peacekeeping mission with an international mandate. We welcomed certain proposals made in this sense and are ready to tackle in a result-oriented manner this issue without delay.
Referring to the military aspect, I should reiterate our concern and deep regrets that the Russian Federation has not yet fulfilled its commitments expressed at the 1999 Istanbul Summit. The complete implementation of these decisions will facilitate the process of entering into force of the Adapted CFE Treaty.
We also underline the need for an early international inspection at the depots with ammunition in the Transnistrian region. The monitoring of the military-industrial enterprises from the eastern region of the Republic of Moldova is long overdue.
Distinguished delegates,
This year, the Republic of Moldova celebrates the fifteenth anniversary of its independence. During these fifteen years, as a member state of the United Nations, we have been fully sharing the common values, responsibilities, achievements and setbacks of our Organization. Since then, we also achieved many significant results in our internal development. Much more remains to be done to this end. Nevertheless, we laid down foundations of a democratic society, where the basic human rights and the rights of national minorities are fully respected. The main achievement has been the consolidation of the Republic of Moldova as a peace-loving independent European country.
The Republic of Moldova has irreversibly chosen the way of European integration as the strategic objective of its foreign policy. We are fully committed to the idea of integrating into the system of political, economic and social values of the European Union’s family. We hope that the successful implementation of the EU-Moldova Action Plan will open for us the possibility to elevate to a new level of contractual relations with the EU.
In conclusion, Mme President, I wish to voice our hope that the proceedings of the General Assembly at its sixty-first session will be conducted in a spirit of solidarity and with a realistic and constructive approach to the complex issues confronting the world today. The delegation of the Republic of Moldova is committed to contribute, alongside other Member States, to the fulfilment of the lofty goals of the United Nations.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Featured
FC Sheriff Tiraspol victory: can national pride go hand in hand with political separatism?

A new football club has earned a leading place in the UEFA Champions League groups and starred in the headlines of worldwide football news yesterday. The Football Club Sheriff Tiraspol claimed a win with the score 2-1 against Real Madrid on the Santiago Bernabeu Stadium in Madrid. That made Sheriff Tiraspol the leader in Group D of the Champions League, including the football club in the groups of the most important European interclub competition for the first time ever.
International media outlets called it a miracle, a shock and a historic event, while strongly emphasizing the origin of the team and the existing political conflict between the two banks of the Dniester. “Football club from a pro-Russian separatist enclave in Moldova pulls off one of the greatest upsets in Champions League history,” claimed the news portals. “Sheriff crushed Real!” they said.
Moldovans made a big fuss out of it on social media, splitting into two groups: those who praised the team and the Republic of Moldova for making history and those who declared that the football club and their merits belong to Transnistria – a problematic breakaway region that claims to be a separate country.
Both groups are right and not right at the same time, as there is a bunch of ethical, political, social and practical matters that need to be considered.
Is it Moldova?
First of all, every Moldovan either from the right or left bank of Dniester (Transnistria) is free to identify himself with this achievement or not to do so, said Vitalie Spranceana, a sociologist, blogger, journalist and urban activist. According to him, boycotting the football club for being a separatist team is wrong.
At the same time, “it’s an illusion to think that territory matters when it comes to football clubs,” Spranceana claimed. “Big teams, the ones included in the Champions League, have long lost their connection both with the countries in which they operate, and with the cities in which they appeared and to which they linked their history. […] In the age of globalized commercial football, teams, including the so-called local ones, are nothing more than global traveling commercial circuses, incidentally linked to cities, but more closely linked to all sorts of dirty, semi-dirty and cleaner cash flows.”
What is more important in this case is the consistency, not so much of citizens, as of politicians from the government who have “no right to celebrate the success of separatism,” as they represent “the national interests, not the personal or collective pleasures of certain segments of the population,” believes the political expert Dionis Cenusa. The victory of FC Sheriff encourages Transnistrian separatism, which receives validation now, he also stated.
“I don’t know how it happens that the “proud Moldovans who chose democracy”, in their enthusiasm for Sheriff Tiraspol’s victory over Real Madrid, forget the need for total and unconditional withdrawal of Russian troops from Transnistria!” declared the journalist Vitalie Ciobanu.
Nowadays, FC Sheriff Tiraspol has no other choice than to represent Moldova internationally. For many years, the team used the Moldovan Football Federation in order to be able to participate in championships, including international ones. That is because the region remains unrecognised by the international community. However, the club’s victory is presented as that of Transnistria within the region, without any reference to the Republic of Moldova, its separatist character being applied in this case especially.
Is it a victory?
In fact, FC Sheriff Tiraspol joining the Champions League is a huge image breakthrough for the Transnistrian region, as the journalist Madalin Necsutu claimed. It is the success of the Tiraspol Club oligarchic patrons. From the practical point of view, FC Sheriff Tiraspol is a sports entity that serves its own interests and the interests of its owners, being dependent on the money invested by Tiraspol (but not only) oligarchs.
Here comes the real dilemma: the Transnistrian team, which is generously funded by money received from corruption schemes and money laundering, is waging an unequal fight with the rest of the Moldovan football clubs, the journalist also declared. The Tiraspol team is about to raise 15.6 million euro for reaching the Champions League groups and the amounts increase depending on their future performance. According to Necsutu, these money will go directly on the account of the club, not to the Moldovan Football Federation, creating an even bigger gab between FC Sheriff and other football clubs from Moldova who have much more modest financial possibilities.
“I do not see anything useful for Moldovan football, not a single Moldovan player is part of FC Sheriff Tiraspol. I do not see anything beneficial for the Moldovan Football Federation or any national team.”
Is it only about football?
FC Sheriff Tiraspol, with a total estimated value of 12.8 million euros, is controlled by Victor Gusan and Ilya Kazmala, being part of Sheriff Holding – a company that controls the trade of wholesale, retail food, fuels and medicine by having monopolies on these markets in Transnistria. The holding carries out car trading activities, but also operates in the field of construction and real estate. Gusan’s people also hold all of the main leadership offices in the breakaway region, from Parliament to the Prime Minister’s seat or the Presidency.
The football club is supported by a holding alleged of smuggling, corruption, money laundering and organised crime. Moldovan media outlets published investigations about the signals regarding the Sheriff’s holding involvement in the vote mobilization and remuneration of citizens on the left bank of the Dniester who participated in the snap parliamentary elections this summer and who were eager to vote for the pro-Russian socialist-communist bloc.
Considering the above, there is a great probability that the Republic of Moldova will still be represented by a football club that is not identified as being Moldovan, being funded from obscure money, growing in power and promoting the Transnistrian conflict in the future as well.
Photo: unknown
Politics
Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita meets high-ranking EU officials in Brussels

Prime Minister of the Republic of Moldova, Natalia Gavrilita, together with Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Nicu Popescu, pay an official visit to Brussels, between September 27-28, being invited by High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell Fontelles.
Today, Prime Minister had a meeting with Charles Michel, President of the European Council. The Moldovan PM thanked the senior European official for the support of the institution in strengthening democratic processes, reforming the judiciary and state institutions, economic recovery and job creation, as well as increasing citizens’ welfare. Natalia Gavrilita expressed her confidence that the current visit laid the foundations for boosting relations between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union, so that, in the next period, it would be possible to advance high-level dialogues on security, justice and energy. Officials also exchanged views on priorities for the Eastern Partnership Summit, to be held in December.
“The EU is open to continue to support the Republic of Moldova and the ambitious reform agenda it proposes. Moldova is an important and priority partner for us,” said Charles Michel.
Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita also met with Paolo Gentiloni, European Commissioner for Economy, expressing her gratitude for the support received through the OMNIBUS macro-financial assistance program. The two officials discussed the need to advance the recovery of money from bank fraud, to strengthen sustainable mechanisms for supporting small and medium-sized enterprises in Moldova, and to standardize the customs and taxes as one of the main conditions for deepening cooperation with the EU in this field.
Additionally, Prime Minister spoke about the importance of the Eastern Partnership and the Deep Free Trade Agreement, noting that the Government’s policies are aimed at developing an economic model aligned with the European economic model, focused on digitalization, energy efficiency and the green economy.
A common press release of the Moldovan Prime Minister with High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission, Josep Borrell Fontelles, took place today, where the agenda of Moldova’s reforms and the main priorities to focus on in the coming months were presented: judiciary reform; fighting COVID-19 pandemic; promoting economic recovery and conditions for growth and job creation; strengthening state institutions and resilience of the country.
“I am here to relaunch the dialogue between my country and the European Union. Our partnership is strong, but I believe there is room for even deeper cooperation and stronger political, economic and sectoral ties. I am convinced that this partnership is the key to the prosperity of our country and I hope that we will continue to strengthen cooperation.”
The Moldovan delegation met Didier Reynders, European Commissioner for Justice. Tomorrow, there are scheduled common meetings with Oliver Varhelyi, European Commissioner for Neighborhood and Enlargement, Adina Valean, European Commissioner for Transport and Kadri Simson, European Commissioner for Energy.
Prime Minister will also attend a public event, along with Katarina Mathernova, Deputy Director-General for Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations.
Photo: gov.md
Politics
Promo-LEX about Maia Sandu’s UN speech: The president must insist on appointing a rapporteur to monitor the situation of human rights in Transnistria

The President of the Republic of Moldova, Maia Sandu, pays an official visit to New York, USA, between September 21-22. There, she participates in the work of the United Nations General Assembly. According to a press release of the President’s Office, the official will deliver a speech at the tribune of the United Nations.
In this context, the Promo-LEX Association suggested the president to request the appointment of a special rapporteur in order to monitor the situation of human rights in the Transnistrian region. According to Promo-LEX, the responsibility for human rights violations in the Transnistrian region arises as a result of the Russian Federation’s military, economic and political control over the Tiraspol regime.
“We consider it imperative to insist on the observance of the international commitments assumed by the Russian Federation regarding the withdrawal of the armed forces and ammunition from the territory of the country,” the representatives of Promo-LEX stated. They consider the speech before the UN an opportunity “to demand the observance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the Russian Federation with reference to this territory which is in its full control.”
“It is important to remember about the numerous cases of murder, torture, ill-treatment, forced enlistment in illegal military structures, the application of pseudo-justice in the Transnistrian region, all carried out under the tacit agreement of the Russian Federation. These findings stem from dozens of rulings and decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights, which found that Russia is responsible for human rights violations in the region.”
The association representatives expressed their hope that the president of the country would give priority to issues related to the human rights situation in the Transnistrian region and would call on relevant international actors to contribute to guaranteeing fundamental human rights and freedoms throughout Moldova.
They asked Maia Sandu to insist on the observance of the obligation to evacuate the ammunition and the military units of the Russian Federation from the territory of the Republic of Moldova, to publicly support the need for the Russian Federation to implement the ECtHR rulings on human rights violations in the Transnistrian region, and to request the appointment of an UN Human Rights Council special rapporteur to monitor the human rights situation in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova.
**
The Promo-LEX Association concluded that 14 out of 25 actions planned within the National Action Plan for the years 2018–2022 concerning respecting human rights in Transnistria were not carried out by the responsible authorities.
The association expressed its concern and mentioned that there are a large number of delays in the planned results. “There is a lack of communication and coordination between the designated institutions, which do not yet have a common vision of interaction for the implementation of the plan.”
Promo-LEX requested the Government of the Republic of Moldova to re-assess the reported activities and to take urgent measures, “which would exclude superficial implementation of future activities and increase the level of accountability of the authorities.”
Photo: peacekeeping.un.org